feedzop-word-mark-logo
searchLogin
Feedzop
homeFor YouUnited StatesUnited States
You
bookmarksYour BookmarkshashtagYour Topics
Trending
Terms of UsePrivacy PolicyAboutJobsPartner With Us

© 2026 Advergame Technologies Pvt. Ltd. ("ATPL"). Gamezop ® & Quizzop ® are registered trademarks of ATPL.

Gamezop is a plug-and-play gaming platform that any app or website can integrate to bring casual gaming for its users. Gamezop also operates Quizzop, a quizzing platform, that digital products can add as a trivia section.

Over 5,000 products from more than 70 countries have integrated Gamezop and Quizzop. These include Amazon, Samsung Internet, Snap, Tata Play, AccuWeather, Paytm, Gulf News, and Branch.

Games and trivia increase user engagement significantly within all kinds of apps and websites, besides opening a new stream of advertising revenue. Gamezop and Quizzop take 30 minutes to integrate and can be used for free: both by the products integrating them and end users

Increase ad revenue and engagement on your app / website with games, quizzes, astrology, and cricket content. Visit: business.gamezop.com

Property Code: 5571

Home / Technology / Copyright Clash: Judge Rules on YouTube Reaction Clips

Copyright Clash: Judge Rules on YouTube Reaction Clips

8 Feb

•

Summary

  • A California judge's ruling could impact streamers using video clips.
  • The case involves allegations of unauthorized video downloading via ripping tools.
  • This decision may hold creators liable for using ripping tools, not just content.
Copyright Clash: Judge Rules on YouTube Reaction Clips

A significant legal development in California could reshape how content creators use copyrighted material in reaction videos. A recent ruling by US Magistrate Judge Virginia K. DeMarchi has denied a request to dismiss a case involving alleged copyright infringement via video "ripping" tools. This case centers on a YouTuber accused of using these tools to download footage without permission, which is a violation of YouTube's terms of service and the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA).

While the defendant's legal team argued that screen recording software, not ripping tools, might have been used, the judge's decision to proceed means the case will continue. This outcome carries broader implications, potentially making creators liable for the very act of using ripping tools, irrespective of the content they ultimately incorporate into their videos. Creators often argue their use of short clips for commentary falls under fair use, but this lawsuit highlights a new facet of copyright enforcement focused on the download method itself.

You may also like

EU Regulator Probes Roblox Over Minors' Risks

30 Jan • 71 reads

article image

Spotify & Labels Sue Shadow Library for Domain Seizure

22 Jan • 94 reads

article image
trending

Salesforce lays off 1000

trending

India US trade tariffs slashed

trending

Margot Robbie's Wuthering Heights panned

trending

CBSE board exams: key details

trending

Jana Nayagan movie court case

trending

Dhakshineswar Suresh Davis Cup hero

trending

Deepika Padukone wears Gaurav Gupta

trending

NZ vs UAE match prediction

trending

iPhone 17 Croma Valentine's sale

Disclaimer: This story has been auto-aggregated and auto-summarised by a computer program. This story has not been edited or created by the Feedzop team.
The case revolves around allegations that a YouTuber used unauthorized 'ripping' tools to download copyrighted video footage without permission.
The ruling could make creators liable for using video ripping tools, not just for the content they post on platforms like YouTube.
The defense claims that screen recording software, rather than specific ripping tools, may have been used, and that the use of short clips constitutes fair use for commentary.

Read more news on

Technologyside-arrowYouTubeside-arrowCaliforniaside-arrow

Artists Gain Global Copyright Power

14 Jan • 105 reads

article image

Hollywood Fights Back: Fires Spark Production Revival

8 Jan • 76 reads

article image

Google Battles Data Scraper SerpApi in Court

20 Dec, 2025 • 25 reads

article image