What is the new GDPval-AA benchmark for AI?

GDPval-AA is a new AI benchmark that tests models on real-world, economically valuable tasks across 44 occupations and 9 industries, assessing their ability to produce professional deliverables.

Why are AI benchmarks becoming obsolete?

Leading AI models have become so advanced that they now master traditional tests, making it difficult to differentiate between them and hindering enterprise decision-making.

How does Artificial Analysis measure AI progress now?

Artificial Analysis's Intelligence Index v4.0 now emphasizes economically useful actions and real-world task completion, incorporating new evaluations like GDPval-AA and CritPT.

Home / Technology / AI Tests Obsolete: New Benchmark Redefines Progress

AI Tests Obsolete: New Benchmark Redefines Progress

7 Jan

•

Summary

New AI benchmark focuses on economically useful actions, not just recall.
GDPval-AA tests AI on real-world tasks across 44 occupations.
Scientific reasoning tests reveal AI still struggles with deep discovery.

AI Tests Obsolete: New Benchmark Redefines Progress

The rapidly evolving field of artificial intelligence is grappling with a significant challenge: existing benchmarks are failing to accurately measure the progress of increasingly sophisticated AI models. Artificial Analysis, a key benchmarking organization, has responded by releasing its Intelligence Index v4.0. This updated index fundamentally redefines how AI capabilities are assessed, moving beyond simple recall to evaluate "economically useful action" across agents, coding, scientific reasoning, and general knowledge.

Central to the new index is GDPval-AA, an evaluation designed to test AI models on real-world tasks relevant to 44 different occupations and nine industries. Unlike previous benchmarks, this test assesses AI's ability to produce professional deliverables such as documents, slides, and spreadsheets. Concurrently, the CritPT benchmark, focusing on graduate-level physics problems, highlights that even advanced AI systems still struggle with deep scientific reasoning, scoring below 11.5% on complex research challenges.