Home / Technology / Linux Creator Defends AI's Role in Development
Linux Creator Defends AI's Role in Development
16 Jul
Summary
- Linus Torvalds approves AI use in Linux kernel development.
- Other maintainers see significant improvements from AI.
- Forks are suggested for developers who reject AI tools.

Linus Torvalds, the creator of Linux, has definitively stated that Artificial Intelligence (AI) is a vital tool for the ongoing development and maintenance of the Linux kernel. He expressed that AI's integration is non-negotiable, asserting that any developers who are uncomfortable with its use should "fork" the project to create their own version. Torvalds views AI as a valuable tool, noting its significant improvements in usefulness over the past year.
This perspective is shared by other leading figures in the Linux kernel community. Greg Kroah-Hartman, who maintains the stable kernel, has noted a shift from low-quality AI-generated reports to genuinely useful ones. This improvement is expected to continue with newer AI models, making AI an increasingly integral part of open-source projects.
While some projects, like the Software Freedom Conservancy, advocate for policies that support developers who reject AI-generated code, prominent kernel maintainers find this stance problematic. They question how to handle situations where AI-assisted tools are used for bug analysis or code backporting, arguing that a contributor's objection to AI should not halt the use of beneficial tools by maintainers.
Senior kernel maintainer Theodore "Ted" Ts'o highlighted potential conflicts, questioning whether automated processes utilizing AI would need to be abandoned if a contributor objects. James Bottomley, another key developer, stated that contributors do not get to dictate the tools maintainers use, implying that AI's utility outweighs individual objections.
Torvalds concluded that the Linux community prioritizes technical merit and better technology over adherence to specific ideologies or fear of new tools. He intends to "loudly ignore" objections to AI use, emphasizing that the goal is to ensure LLM tools assist maintainers rather than hinder them. The decision to use AI tools is based on their technical merit, not religious objections.