How do AI data centers impact local water supplies?

AI data centers use large volumes of fresh water for cooling, which can deplete local supplies, especially in water-scarce areas.

What public health risks are associated with AI's water consumption?

Reduced water availability due to AI data centers can lead to poor sanitation and an increase in gastrointestinal diseases and other illnesses.

Which countries are facing water scarcity issues due to AI?

While AI's impact is global, specific concerns have been raised about data centers in water-stressed regions within countries like the United States and potential future developments in African nations.

Home / Technology / AI's Thirst: Data Centers Drain Vital Water

AI's Thirst: Data Centers Drain Vital Water

21 Jan

•

Summary

AI data centers consume massive amounts of fresh water for cooling.
AI is projected to significantly increase global water usage by 2027.
Water scarcity linked to AI threatens public health and sanitation.

AI's Thirst: Data Centers Drain Vital Water

The rapid expansion of artificial intelligence, particularly generative AI, is leading to a massive increase in energy and water consumption. AI-powered searches and applications demand significant power, with advancements like Graphics Processing Units (GPUs) generating substantial heat. This necessitates extensive water usage for cooling data centers, with global water demand predicted to rise dramatically by 2027.

Data centers located in water-stressed areas pose a significant threat to public health. Reduced freshwater availability impacts sanitation and hygiene, potentially leading to an increase in gastrointestinal diseases, especially among children. Reports indicate major tech companies are already withdrawing water from regions facing water stress.

Marginalized communities are increasingly reporting polluted water sources, which they attribute to nearby AI data center construction. Concerns about environmental justice are mounting, especially as AI infrastructure expands into regions with weaker regulatory oversight, raising questions about who will bear the environmental impacts.