How is AI being used in the legal system?

AI is being used for tasks like resolving document-based disputes through AI Arbitrators, assisting judges with legal research and case timelines, and processing court filings.

What are the risks associated with AI in legal proceedings?

Risks include AI generating false information (hallucinations), introducing human biases, and potentially eroding public trust in the justice system.

Can AI make legal processes more accessible and affordable?

Yes, AI tools like the AI Arbitrator aim to provide faster and lower-cost dispute resolution, especially benefiting small and medium-sized businesses that struggle with legal expenses.

Home / Technology / AI in Law: Speeding Up Justice, But at What Cost?

AI in Law: Speeding Up Justice, But at What Cost?

27 Jan

•

Summary

AI Arbitrator streamlines document-based disputes.
AI tools aid judges but risk generating false info.
AI offers faster, cheaper legal resolution for businesses.

AI in Law: Speeding Up Justice, But at What Cost?

Generative AI is increasingly being integrated into the legal system, offering both potential benefits and significant risks. The American Arbitration Association has developed an AI Arbitrator designed to expedite document-based dispute resolution, making legal services more accessible and affordable for businesses. This tool, built on OpenAI's models, assists parties through their disputes and drafts decisions, with human oversight at critical stages.

Despite these advancements, the use of AI in legal settings raises concerns. High-profile instances of AI generating fabricated facts have led to judicial mea culpas and new policies. Academics warn about AI's tendency to introduce false information, import human biases, and erode public trust in the justice system.

However, proponents like Bridget McCormack, head of the AAA, emphasize AI's potential to democratize legal access. She highlights that many small and medium-sized businesses cannot afford legal help, and AI could provide a navigable and affordable dispute resolution path. This optimistic view contrasts with the cautious approach of others who point to AI's inherent limitations and the need for human judgment.