What are the biggest risks with AI agents like those at Rubrik?

AI agents can cause major disasters due to "zero-day issues," involving governance and scope definition, leading to unintended consequences.

What is the 'zero-day deliberation' for AI agents?

It refers to the critical planning phase before creating AI agents, focusing on governance, data compliance, and defining objectives.

How is FOMO impacting AI agent deployment?

Fear of missing out drives companies to adopt AI agents rapidly, even with significant risks and unresolved zero-day issues.

Home / Technology / AI Agents Trigger Disasters: Zero-Day Hurdles Ahead

AI Agents Trigger Disasters: Zero-Day Hurdles Ahead

2 Dec

•

Summary

AI agents are causing major enterprise computing disasters.
Zero-day issues, involving governance and scope, block AI agent progress.
Fear of missing out fuels rapid AI agent adoption despite risks.

AI Agents Trigger Disasters: Zero-Day Hurdles Ahead

Enterprise adoption of AI agents is currently plagued by significant implementation disasters, a situation exacerbated by "zero-day issues." These unforeseen challenges, particularly in establishing proper governance and defining the scope of an agent's actions, are halting progress. Companies like Rubrik are developing tools, such as Agent Rewind, to mitigate the impact of agent errors, but the core problem lies in proactive deliberation before deployment.

The "zero-day" concept here extends beyond cybersecurity vulnerabilities to encompass the crucial planning phase. CISOs and CIOs must meticulously define what agents are intended to do and how success will be measured. Lack of visibility into agent operations and data access creates major concerns, potentially leading to restricted data usage, which sub-optimizes the AI's capabilities. Proactive discussions with security leaders are essential to accelerate AI projects.