Why was Liverpool's goal disallowed against Manchester City?

The goal was disallowed because the on-field officials ruled that Andy Robertson committed an offside offense by ducking under the ball, potentially impacting the goalkeeper.

Was the VAR decision correct for Liverpool's disallowed goal?

An expert panel reviewed the incident and concluded that VAR was correct not to intervene, despite a majority of the panel believing the on-field decision was incorrect.

What was the outcome of the expert panel review for the Man City vs Liverpool match?

The panel voted three to two that the on-field decision to disallow the goal was incorrect, but they agreed VAR correctly did not overturn the call.

Home / Sports / VAR Correct, Panel Split on Liverpool's Disallowed Goal

VAR Correct, Panel Split on Liverpool's Disallowed Goal

20 Nov

•

Summary

An expert panel reviewed Liverpool's disallowed goal at Manchester City.
The panel voted three to two that the on-field decision was incorrect.
Despite the split, VAR's decision not to intervene was deemed correct.

VAR Correct, Panel Split on Liverpool's Disallowed Goal

A recent assessment by an expert panel has shed light on the contentious disallowed goal scored by Liverpool against Manchester City. The panel, tasked with reviewing significant refereeing decisions, found itself divided on the initial call. Although a majority voted that the on-field decision to disallow the goal was incorrect, they concurred that the video assistant referee (VAR) team made the right call by not overturning it.

This review addresses the incident in the 38th minute of the match, where Liverpool's Virgil van Dijk believed he had equalized. Referee Chris Kavanagh and his assistant ruled Andy Robertson offside for ducking under the ball, a decision supported by VAR officials Michael Oliver and Tim Wood. Liverpool had formally questioned the ruling, believing the criteria for an offside offense were not met.

The outcome highlights a significant debate within football officiating. While the VAR's adherence to protocol was validated, the split within the expert panel underscores the subjective nature of certain decisions and their impact on match outcomes. The panel's split vote suggests ongoing discussion regarding the interpretation of offside rules and player interference.

Disclaimer: This story has been auto-aggregated and auto-summarised by a computer program. This story has not been edited or created by the Feedzop team.