Why is the Pro Football Hall of Fame reviewing its voting process?

The Hall of Fame is reviewing its voting process after Bill Belichick's omission from the 2026 class caused significant public outcry and discussion.

What changes might the Pro Football Hall of Fame implement?

The Hall of Fame is considering changes such as reinstating in-person voting, holding deliberations closer to the announcement, and potentially replacing voters who violate rules.

Have recent rule changes affected Hall of Fame voting?

Yes, recent rule changes that group seniors, coaches, and contributors have made it more difficult for candidates to meet the 80% induction threshold.

Home / Sports / Hall of Fame Voting Under Fire After Belichick Snub

Hall of Fame Voting Under Fire After Belichick Snub

7 Feb

•

Summary

Hall of Fame board will consider changes to its voting process.
Bill Belichick's omission from the 2026 class sparked outrage.
In-person voting and discussions are planned to resume.
Voters may be replaced for breaking rules or not picking top candidates.

Hall of Fame Voting Under Fire After Belichick Snub

The Pro Football Hall of Fame is contemplating modifications to its selection process after Bill Belichick's notable absence from the 2026 class ignited significant public outcry. Hall of Fame President Jim Porter indicated that potential changes are being explored, emphasizing that these are not exclusively a reaction to Belichick's perceived snub. The Hall intends to revert to in-person voting for its 50-member committee, a practice suspended during the COVID-19 pandemic. Discussions regarding vote timing are also underway to minimize leaks before the official NFL Honors announcement.

Furthermore, the Hall of Fame is reviewing its voter roster, with the possibility of replacing members who have contravened rules, such as publicly discussing off-record deliberations or failing to select the most deserving candidates. Porter stressed that voters must adhere to instructions to choose the most deserving individuals, refuting the notion of prioritizing players based on perceived last chances. Recent rule changes grouping seniors, coaches, and contributors have complicated the voting, making it harder to meet the 80% threshold for induction.