Did Everton deserve a penalty against Arsenal?

Yes, the Premier League's Key Match Incidents Panel ruled Everton should have been awarded a penalty.

Why wasn't Everton given a penalty by referee Sam Barrott?

The referee did not award a penalty, but the panel later deemed his decision incorrect and that VAR should have intervened.

What did David Moyes say about the penalty incident?

David Moyes expressed frustration with the decision and concerns about consistency in refereeing calls.

Home / Sports / Everton Penalty Snub: Panel Upholds Foul Claim

Everton Penalty Snub: Panel Upholds Foul Claim

1 Jan

•

Summary

Premier League panel ruled Everton should have had a penalty.
Panel voted 3-2 that referee Sam Barrott's decision was incorrect.
VAR Michael Salisbury should have sent Barrott to the monitor.

Everton Penalty Snub: Panel Upholds Foul Claim

The Premier League's Key Match Incidents Panel has determined that Everton should have been awarded a penalty during their December 20th match against Arsenal, which they lost 1-0. The crucial moment occurred in the 58th minute when Thierno Barry of Everton appeared to be fouled by Arsenal defender William Saliba. The referee, Sam Barrott, did not award a penalty at the time.

In a close vote of 3-2, the panel concluded that Barrott's decision was incorrect and that VAR Michael Salisbury should have prompted a review. Panel members noted that Saliba "carelessly kicks Barry with no contact on the ball," deeming it a clear error. Conversely, others felt the impact was insufficient and the reaction delayed.

Manager David Moyes expressed disappointment, highlighting similar incidents where penalties were given to other clubs. He also questioned why the referee did not identify a handball offense by his own player, Jake O'Brien, which led to Arsenal's penalty, suggesting a lack of on-field decision-making even after VAR consultation.