Home / Sports / Athlete Defends PED Use for Enhanced Games
Athlete Defends PED Use for Enhanced Games
20 May
Summary
- Swimmer defends PED use, citing no immediate health risks.
- Proponents argue society accepts risks for entertainment.
- UK Sport firmly opposes Enhanced Games, threatening sanctions.

James Magnussen, an Australian swimmer, has publicly defended his use of PEDs, asserting that any significant long-term health implications would have presented themselves by now. He argued that professional athletes inherently take health risks due to extreme training regimens, a perspective shared by proponents like Byron Hyde. Hyde suggests that the Enhanced Games merely highlight society's existing acceptance of athletes risking harm for entertainment, questioning the inconsistency in outrage over pharmaceutical enhancements versus risks like brain trauma in boxing.
Conversely, UK Sport director Kate Baker expressed strong opposition to the Enhanced Games, emphasizing a commitment to "winning well" through healthy means. UK Sport has reiterated to its athletes that participation in such events could violate eligibility policies, leading to disqualification from funding, coaching, and medical support. This stance underscores a fundamental disagreement on the ethics and acceptance of artificially enhanced athletic performance for spectator appeal.