Chelsea's Revolving Door: Players Treated as Assets, Not People

As of September 8th, 2025, a growing concern has emerged over the way football clubs treat their players, with Chelsea's handling of Ishe Samuels-Smith's transfer saga serving as a prime example.

In July 2025, Samuels-Smith moved on a permanent deal from Chelsea to Strasbourg. However, by the end of August, Chelsea had triggered a purchase clause to buy him back and then immediately loaned him to Swansea. This type of player shuffling, where individuals are treated as mere assets on a balance sheet, has sparked criticism from experts who argue that the "bomb squad" tactic is both cruel and legally questionable.

"Behind all these executive decisions are players who care about their professional lives," says Amy Lawrence, highlighting the human element that is often overlooked in such transactions. The article emphasizes that a player's personal circumstances, including where they live, their family situation, and the needs of their children and parents, should be taken into account, rather than simply focusing on financial considerations.

While Samuels-Smith's case may not be the best example, as he was reportedly homesick and happy to return to the UK, the broader issue of player welfare remains a concern. The article suggests that the "bomb squad" tactic, where players are sidelined and forced to train separately, is likely to become more prevalent as clubs continue to prioritize their balance sheets over the well-being of their employees.