What criteria does the College Football Playoff committee use for rankings?

The committee considers game footage, special teams performance, and elite quarterback play, among other factors, when determining rankings.

Does margin of victory matter in CFP rankings?

While not explicitly stated as the primary factor, extensive video watching by the committee suggests dominant performances might carry more weight.

How important is quarterback play for CFP rankings?

Elite quarterback play is acknowledged as a significant factor by committee members, though its application appears inconsistent.

Home / Sports / CFP Committee's Rankings: What Really Matters?

CFP Committee's Rankings: What Really Matters?

26 Nov

•

Summary

Committee chair noted Oregon has 'really good special teams'.
Dominant wins may matter due to extensive video review.
Elite quarterback play is a significant, though inconsistently applied, factor.

CFP Committee's Rankings: What Really Matters?

The College Football Playoff selection committee's enigmatic ranking process is shedding some light, with special teams unexpectedly highlighted. Committee chair Hunter Yurachek mentioned Oregon's "really good special teams" as a factor, prompting questions about the weight given to various aspects of play beyond offense and defense.

The committee extensively reviews game footage, implying that visually dominant performances could hold more sway in rankings. This intense video watching suggests that the unfolding of a lopsided game might be a significant data point for the evaluators.

Elite quarterback play is consistently mentioned as a key factor, yet its impact appears unevenly applied. For instance, Michigan's ranking significantly improved after a substantial win, indicating that recent strong performances are closely monitored.

Disclaimer: This story has been auto-aggregated and auto-summarised by a computer program. This story has not been edited or created by the Feedzop team.