What did Martin Brundle say about Max Verstappen's actions in the Mexico GP?

Brundle believes that Verstappen should have received a penalty for bypassing turns 2-3 after running wide at turn 1, as he made "no effort whatsoever" to make the corner.

Why does Brundle think the FIA should have penalized Verstappen?

Brundle argues that Verstappen's maneuver should have been penalized as a "deterrent to stop the silliness" and prevent similar actions by other drivers in the future.

How did the FIA's handling of the turn 1 incident compare to their penalty on Lewis Hamilton?

The FIA did not penalize any of the five drivers involved in the turn 1 incident, but did penalize Lewis Hamilton for leaving the track and gaining an advantage later in the race, which Brundle criticized as inconsistent.

Home / Sports / Brundle Calls for Penalty on Verstappen's Mexico GP Antics

Brundle Calls for Penalty on Verstappen's Mexico GP Antics

31 Oct

•

Summary

Brundle says Verstappen should have been penalized
Verstappen bypassed turns 2-3 after running wide at turn 1
FIA criticized for not penalizing Verstappen like Hamilton

In the aftermath of the Mexico City Grand Prix, motorsports commentator Martin Brundle has criticized the FIA's handling of the race, particularly in regards to Max Verstappen's actions on the opening lap.

Brundle states that Verstappen, the reigning four-time world champion, should have received a penalty for his maneuver at turn 1. After running wide on the outside, Verstappen bypassed turns 2 and 3, rejoining the circuit in a better position. Brundle argues that Verstappen made "no effort whatsoever" to make the corner, and that his actions should have warranted a penalty as a "deterrent to stop the silliness."

The FIA ultimately did not penalize any of the five drivers involved in the turn 1 incident, drawing criticism from some fans for their lack of consistency. Lewis Hamilton, however, was penalized for leaving the track and gaining a lasting advantage on lap 6 while battling Verstappen.