Cleared Scientist Fights Back on Dog Heart Study

Frank Prato, the lead scientist at the heart of a controversial canine cardiac study, has publicly defended his research for the first time since his lab in London, Ontario, was closed. Prato revealed that two independent animal ethics committees have cleared him of all abuse allegations. His research, conducted at St. Joseph's Hospital, involved creating three-hour heart attacks in dogs to study post-event conditions.

Prato refutes claims of secrecy, stating the research began in 1982 and that dogs, with cardiovascular systems similar to humans, are an appropriate model. He emphasized that the dogs were fully anesthetized and experienced no pain, unlike human heart attack sufferers. The research was found to be in line with approved protocols, contributing significantly to the clinical management of myocardial infarction patients worldwide.

Despite the exoneration, the research was halted following public outcry. Prato expressed distress over the cessation of work that he believes could save numerous lives, highlighting the potential negative impact on the 750,000 heart failure patients in Canada. He argued that prioritizing animal companionship over potential human life-saving advancements is a misplaced value.

External reviews by Western University's Animal Care Committee and the Canadian Council on Animal Care found the allegations unsubstantiated, confirming the dogs were well-cared for and pain-free. St. Joseph's Health Care London also commissioned an external review, with findings expected soon. Prato hopes to resume his work to advance treatments for heart disease.