Home / Science / Conquest Man: Neither Norman Nor Saxon?
Conquest Man: Neither Norman Nor Saxon?
30 Aug
Summary
- Skeleton's DNA suggests Scandinavian origins.
- Man lived in 50s-60s, stocky build, healed fractures.
- Coffin oak felled in 1079, post-Battle of Hastings.
The identity of a man interred in Barton-upon-Humber, referred to as 'Conquest Man,' is being re-examined. Previous analysis of his skeleton indicated he died in his 50s or 60s, possessed a stocky build, and had sustained multiple healed fractures. Further studies revealed the oak used for his coffin was felled in 1079.
Recent research, involving multiple institutions, suggests this individual was likely neither Norman nor Saxon, challenging traditional narratives of the era following the 1066 Battle of Hastings. DNA analysis indicates substantial continental and Scandinavian ancestry, while isotopic studies of his teeth suggest a possible period spent in a colder climate during adolescence.
Although buried in a cemetery associated with a pre-conquest church, his grave goods, including applewood staffs, bear a distinct Scandinavian influence. Researchers posit it's plausible he arrived from Scandinavia, given Barton's location within the Viking-controlled Danelaw and the common North Sea trade routes. This provides a nuanced view of the period's interconnectedness.
