SC Slams Food Regulator Over Warning Labels

The Supreme Court on Thursday expressed strong displeasure with the Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI) for the prolonged delay in introducing Front-of-Pack Warning Labels (FOPWL) for packaged food products. These labels are intended to clearly indicate high levels of sugar, salt, and saturated fats.

The bench, led by Justice J B Pardiwala, questioned the FSSAI's stance, suggesting potential industry influence and inquiring about the authorities' commitment to public health, particularly for children. The court has granted the government a final two-week period to present its definitive decision on the matter, indicating it will issue its own directions if no resolution is reached.

The apex court's intervention came after a public interest petition filed by the Kerala-based organization 3S and Our Health Society. Earlier this year, the Supreme Court had directed the Centre to consider implementing such labels. During Thursday's hearing, the petitioner's counsel pointed to FSSAI meeting minutes that suggested opposition to the proposed labeling.

Representing the Centre, Additional Solicitor General Brijender Chahar attempted to justify the delay by highlighting the potential impact on traditional Indian food products and micro, small, and medium enterprises. He argued that many traditional items, including "namkeen," might be unfairly labeled as unhealthy, and suggested that India need not blindly follow international labeling formats.

Justice Pardiwala countered these arguments, emphasizing that such labels would foster public awareness about consumption. The court also firmly rejected the pleas of manufacturers seeking to influence the decision, stating that citizen health takes precedence over business interests. The bench underscored India's commitment to global health standards, asserting that the nation should not lag in public health concerns, especially for its children.