Home / Health / Judge: Colgate Deceived Parents on Mouthwash Safety
Judge: Colgate Deceived Parents on Mouthwash Safety
30 Mar
Summary
- Lawsuits claim Colgate misled parents about children's mouthwash suitability.
- Judge ruled lawsuits can proceed, citing consumer confusion on usage.
- Previous settlements involved toothpaste packaging redesigns.

U.S. District Judge Andrea Wood has allowed two class-action lawsuits against Colgate-Palmolive to proceed. These lawsuits contend that the company deceptively marketed its fluoride mouthwashes as safe for young children. The judge noted that the average consumer might not easily know the appropriate amount of mouthwash for children under six, or if it is suitable at all.
Colgate's prominent "kids" and "children's" branding, alongside flavors like Bubble Fruit, suggested safety for youngsters. The company's argument that consumers would recognize mouthwash as an over-the-counter drug and check FDA warnings was unconvincing to the judge. She emphasized that specific warnings on rear labels are required by law for young children's products.
This ruling comes amid a broader trend of litigation against dental product manufacturers. Procter & Gamble, Perrigo, and Sanofi have also faced lawsuits concerning their fluoride products for children. In previous resolutions, Colgate and P&G agreed to redesign packaging for their toothpaste brands following investigations by state attorneys general. The debate over fluoride's benefits versus potential risks continues, with ongoing discussions about its impact on public health and child development.