Home / Environment / Activists Demand Public Vote on Water Ownership
Activists Demand Public Vote on Water Ownership
13 Apr
Summary
- Campaigners petition for a referendum on water company ownership.
- Government rejects nationalization, citing high costs and disruption.
- Experts warn against assuming public ownership guarantees improvement.

Two prominent campaigners, Ash Smith and Peter Hammond, who were recently featured in the Channel 4 docudrama "Dirty Business," are spearheading a petition calling for a national referendum on the ownership of water companies. Their primary objective is to persuade the government to return the water industry to public control, asserting that citizens are fed up with environmental degradation driven by private financial interests.
Musician Feargal Sharkey has publicly endorsed the petition, criticizing the government for ignoring evidence and public sentiment regarding the privatized water system's failures. Smith and Hammond's decade-long investigation into English water companies, particularly their local provider Thames Water, has highlighted issues such as illegal sewage spills impacting rivers like the Windrush and Pang.
Despite Thames Water's assurances of upgrades and investment, a government spokesperson dismissed nationalization as a solution. They projected a £100 billion cost, significant disruption to investment, and worsening pollution during a transition. The spokesperson highlighted current government actions, including banning unfair bonuses and introducing new legislation to hold companies accountable.
However, Professor Christian Dunn of Bangor University urged caution, stating that public ownership does not inherently guarantee improvement. He raised concerns about the financial implications and potential competition for government funding against sectors like health and defense, suggesting a need for a nuanced national discussion.