Why did UN climate talks nearly collapse at COP30?

The talks neared collapse because the final draft omitted any mention of fossil fuel phase-out roadmaps, causing a major divide among nations.

What was the main point of contention at COP30?

The primary contention was whether developed nations should lead emissions cuts and how quickly the world should transition away from fossil fuels.

What progress was made despite the fossil fuel divide?

Progress was seen in climate finance, with a work program established, and a compromise was reached on trade measures related to climate action.

Home / Environment / UN Climate Talks Collapse Over Fossil Fuel Divide

UN Climate Talks Collapse Over Fossil Fuel Divide

22 Nov, 2025

•

Summary

Final climate text omits fossil fuel phase-out language.
Nations split over developed vs. developing countries' burden.
Climate finance and trade measures see partial progress.

UN Climate Talks Collapse Over Fossil Fuel Divide

UN climate talks faced a near collapse Friday as negotiators released a final text that removed all mentions of fossil fuel phase-out roadmaps. This crucial omission highlighted the deep division between developed nations and developing countries over who should shoulder the responsibility for emissions cuts and the pace of transitioning away from fossil fuels. The draft agreement surfaced after marathon negotiations and even survived a fire.

Nearly 200 nations were split, with China, India, and Russia rejecting a prescriptive fossil fuel roadmap, citing historical responsibility of developed nations. Conversely, around 30 countries, led by Colombia, stated they could not accept a deal without such a roadmap, emphasizing the urgency of the climate crisis. EU and French officials expressed strong disappointment, deeming the situation unacceptable and facing a potential no-deal outcome.