Home / Environment / SC Seeks Expert View on Aravalli Zoo Safari
SC Seeks Expert View on Aravalli Zoo Safari
22 Jan
Summary
- Supreme Court requires CEC review of Haryana's zoo safari plan.
- Project requires expert opinion before proceeding, court states.
- Previous stay on project work remains in effect.

The Supreme Court, on January 22, 2026, directed the Central Empowered Committee (CEC) to examine Haryana's proposal for a zoo safari in the Aravalli hills. This decision came after a plea by five retired bureaucrats, which had led to a stay on the project on October 8, 2025. The court noted that no expert opinion had been obtained for the project's feasibility. Haryana submitted a draft project report to the Central Zoo Authority without prior expert assessment. The bench, led by CJI Surya Kant, issued notice to the CEC, requesting a report on the project. The stay on the project continues, pending the CEC's review. Haryana's counsel argued that the project, intended for degraded forest land where illegal mining occurred, would aid in forest protection and activate local water sources. They stated the project's focus on a zoo safari differs from tiger safari projects, potentially making previous rulings inapplicable. An amicus curiae pointed out the project's early stage and suggested examining impacts on the water table, afforestation plans, and animal sourcing. The court stressed that the CEC's independent opinion on ecological damage would be crucial. Applicants expressed concern that the safari project on forest land could harm the Aravalli ranges. While initially planned for 10,000 acres, the Haryana government reduced the area to approximately 3,300 acres, stating the project would support conservation, wildlife research, and local employment, with 70% of the area designated as a green zone.




