feedzop-word-mark-logo
searchLogin
Feedzop
homeFor YouUnited StatesUnited States
You
bookmarksYour BookmarkshashtagYour Topics
Trending
trending

Djokovic ends losing semi-streak

trending

YouTube TV drops ESPN

trending

Army defeats Temple in football

trending

Rybakina wins WTA Finals title

trending

Southern Miss defeats Arkansas State

trending

Georgia beats Mississippi State

trending

Miami defeats Syracuse in football

trending

Indiana survives vs Penn State

trending

Washington defeats Wisconsin

Terms of UsePrivacy PolicyAboutJobsPartner With Us

© 2025 Advergame Technologies Pvt. Ltd. ("ATPL"). Gamezop ® & Quizzop ® are registered trademarks of ATPL.

Gamezop is a plug-and-play gaming platform that any app or website can integrate to bring casual gaming for its users. Gamezop also operates Quizzop, a quizzing platform, that digital products can add as a trivia section.

Over 5,000 products from more than 70 countries have integrated Gamezop and Quizzop. These include Amazon, Samsung Internet, Snap, Tata Play, AccuWeather, Paytm, Gulf News, and Branch.

Games and trivia increase user engagement significantly within all kinds of apps and websites, besides opening a new stream of advertising revenue. Gamezop and Quizzop take 30 minutes to integrate and can be used for free: both by the products integrating them and end users

Increase ad revenue and engagement on your app / website with games, quizzes, astrology, and cricket content. Visit: business.gamezop.com

Property Code: 5571

Home / Environment / Lawyers Challenge €4bn Plastic Plant, Citing Underestimated Health and Climate Impacts

Lawyers Challenge €4bn Plastic Plant, Citing Underestimated Health and Climate Impacts

6 Nov

•

Summary

  • Lawyers argue plant's pollution will cause 410 deaths, exceeding 300 permanent jobs
  • Carbon emissions from plant's supply chain could reach 5 times Ineos's estimates
  • Courts to weigh in on including "scope 3" emissions in environmental assessments
Lawyers Challenge €4bn Plastic Plant, Citing Underestimated Health and Climate Impacts

In a legal challenge filed on November 6th, 2025, lawyers, community members, and financial experts are seeking to stop the construction of a €4bn petrochemical plant in Antwerp, Belgium. The plant, known as Project One and being built by Ineos, is designed to transform ethane from US shale gas into the raw material for plastic production.

However, new evidence suggests the plant's environmental and health impacts have been vastly underestimated. Research indicates the air pollution from the facility would cause 410 deaths once operational, far exceeding the 300 permanent jobs the company claims it will create. Additionally, lawyers argue that Ineos failed to accurately calculate the plant's full supply chain emissions, which could reach 3.8 million tonnes of CO2 equivalent annually - around five times higher than the company's own estimates.

This legal challenge comes at a crucial time, as courts around the world have recently clarified the need to include "scope 3" emissions - those that occur outside the facility but are enabled by its existence - in environmental impact assessments. Tatiana Luján of ClientEarth, who is leading the case, says this is the first time a court will weigh in on the issue of scope 3 emissions and plastics production.

Despite Ineos's claims that the plant will be the "most environmentally friendly steam cracker in Europe," the lawyers argue that the project's reliance on fossil fuels and its massive emissions make it incompatible with the urgent need to reduce plastic production and address the climate crisis.

Disclaimer: This story has been auto-aggregated and auto-summarised by a computer program. This story has not been edited or created by the Feedzop team.
The legal challenge argues that the air pollution from the €4bn petrochemical plant in Antwerp, Belgium will cause 410 deaths, far exceeding the 300 permanent jobs it will create.
Lawyers say the plant's full supply chain emissions could reach 3.8 million tonnes of CO2 equivalent annually, around five times higher than Ineos's own estimates.
Recent court rulings have clarified the need to include "scope 3" emissions - those that occur outside the facility but are enabled by its existence - in environmental impact assessments, making this a crucial issue in the legal challenge against the Ineos plant.

Read more news on

Environmentside-arrow

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

You may also like

Spider Web Decorations Enhance Vibration Detection for Prey Hunting

31 Oct • 34 reads

article image

Swiss Assisted Suicide Clinic Accused of Enabling Unauthorized Deaths

30 Oct • 37 reads

article image

UK Braces for Destructive Winds and Heavy Rains from Storm Benjamin

22 Oct • 81 reads

article image

Shanghai Masters Champ Vacherot Suffers Narrow Defeat Against Fritz

23 Oct • 76 reads

article image

Top Seeds Stumble as Underdogs Shine at Swiss Indoors 2025

24 Oct • 51 reads

article image