Home / Environment / Goa Fights Tiger Reserve: Population or Corridor?

Goa Fights Tiger Reserve: Population or Corridor?

Summary

  • Goa government disputes permanent tiger presence, calling them transient.
  • State argues against tiger reserve due to population density concerns.
  • Supreme Court seeks a report on stakeholders' views on tiger habitat.
Goa Fights Tiger Reserve: Population or Corridor?

The Goa government is embroiled in a legal battle over the declaration of the Mhadei sanctuary as a tiger reserve. While arguing for water-sharing with neighboring states, Goa previously asserted a resident tiger population within its forests. However, in a separate Supreme Court case, the state now contends that tigers are transient, using the area as a corridor between Karnataka and Maharashtra.

The government's opposition to the tiger reserve stems from two main points: the required inviolate space exceeding the state's protected area, and the potential displacement of a large human population. They highlight a low camera trap count of three tigers in 2018, with no cubs, suggesting only temporary presence.

This dispute follows repeated requests since 2011 from the NTCA to designate the area a tiger reserve. The Supreme Court has tasked a Central Empowered Committee with hearing all stakeholders and submitting a report, while also halting resort approvals in the disputed region.

Disclaimer: This story has been auto-aggregated and auto-summarised by a computer program. This story has not been edited or created by the Feedzop team.
Goa argues tigers are transient, not permanent residents, and citing potential social unrest and insufficient protected land.
The Supreme Court directed a Central Empowered Committee to hear stakeholders and report on the matter.
Goa points to a low camera trap count of three tigers in 2018 and the absence of cubs, suggesting passage through the area.

Read more news on