Why is the EPA extending deadlines for coal plants?

The EPA states the extension is to ensure electric grid reliability during the transition away from fossil fuels.

What are the dangers of coal ash ponds like those at Baldwin plant?

These unlined ponds leak toxic heavy metals, including arsenic and mercury, into groundwater and waterways.

Who opposes the EPA's coal ash rule extension?

Environmental groups like Earthjustice and community advocates are strongly opposing the EPA's proposal.

Home / Environment / EPA Coal Ash Plan Sparks Outrage

EPA Coal Ash Plan Sparks Outrage

7 Jan

•

Summary

EPA proposes extending coal plant closures until October 2031.
Coal ash ponds leak toxic heavy metals into groundwater.
Environmentalists argue the plan favors industry over health.

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency is facing significant public opposition to its proposed extension of closure deadlines for 11 coal plants until October 2031. Three of these plants are located in Illinois, and one in northwest Indiana. Environmental experts contend that this proposal benefits the coal industry rather than safeguarding communities from the hazards of coal ash.

These 11 sites contain 13 unlined coal ash impoundments that are actively leaking toxic contaminants, including arsenic, mercury, and lead, into nearby groundwater. Environmental advocates, like Mychal Ozaeta of Earthjustice, highlight that these impoundments are among the most dangerous in the nation due to these leaks. Despite a 2018 court order to strengthen regulations on coal combustion residuals, the EPA is now seeking to delay closure and cleanup obligations for utility companies.