Harvard Class Size Hike Sparks Union Clash

A contentious proposal by Harvard University to increase class sizes in its introductory Expository Writing "Studio 10" courses from 10 to 15 students has intensified ongoing labor negotiations. Union representatives for Harvard Academic Workers-United Auto Workers assert that this change unilaterally shifts working conditions and increases instructor workload, thus requiring negotiation.

Harvard officials, however, characterized the proposal as an academic decision, while expressing openness to discussing its effects with the union. The core of the dispute lies in determining if increasing class size constitutes a mandatory subject for bargaining, a point labor law experts suggest is not always straightforward, often necessitating negotiation even if an employer has discretion.

The proposed change specifically impacts "Studio 10," a course designed for students needing individualized instruction, where smaller class sizes facilitate regular one-on-one feedback. Union members argue that increasing enrollment would fundamentally alter the course's structure and the level of attention students receive.

This disagreement emerges as Harvard faces financial constraints, leading to reduced hiring of non-tenure-track faculty. Expository Writing, a required first-year course, limits the university's options for cutting offerings. Union officials suggest that staffing adjustments, such as larger classes, are being used to manage these financial pressures, with the burden falling on specific programs like "Studio 10."

The conflict unfolds as the contract negotiations, now in their 18th month, also involve union proposals on layoffs, job security, and protections for non-citizen workers, alongside Harvard's rejection of provisions related to immigration authorities and green card sponsorship.

Experts note that even if a complaint is filed, the likely outcome would be a return to negotiations, as the absence of bargaining could complicate dispute resolution. Union representatives view the class size proposal as indicative of broader concerns regarding the negotiation's progress and a perceived disconnect between bargaining discussions and administrative actions.