Home / Crime and Justice / Statisticians Dispute BBC's Damning Claims Against Nurse Lucy Letby

Statisticians Dispute BBC's Damning Claims Against Nurse Lucy Letby

Summary

  • BBC program mixed up "working" and "ventilated" shifts, leading to inflated dislodged tube rates
  • Statisticians call for correction and apology from BBC over "seriously erroneous information"
  • Letby was supervised during shifts and passed her placements at Liverpool Women's Hospital
Statisticians Dispute BBC's Damning Claims Against Nurse Lucy Letby

According to the latest developments, statisticians have challenged the BBC's portrayal of nurse Lucy Letby's record, claiming the Panorama program presented inaccurate information. The BBC had reported that tubes were dislodged in 40% of Letby's 50 shifts at the neonatal unit, suggesting she was either "spectacularly bad" or "acting maliciously."

However, experts have now revealed that the BBC mixed up "working" shifts with "ventilated" shifts. Accounting for the actual number of ventilated shifts, the dislodged tube rate was around 4%, only slightly higher than the normal rate. Dr. Jane Hutton, a professor of statistics, has called for a correction and apology from the BBC, stating the journalists "broadcast seriously erroneous information."

The BBC has acknowledged the inaccuracy, saying it has updated the documentary on iPlayer to reflect the correct figures. The inquiry also heard that Letby was supervised throughout her shifts at the Liverpool hospital and had passed both her placements, with her clinical competence being monitored by assigned mentors.

As the investigation into Letby's case continues, the focus now shifts to ensuring accurate reporting and analysis of the evidence, rather than relying on misleading statistics.

Disclaimer: This story has been auto-aggregated and auto-summarised by a computer program. This story has not been edited or created by the Feedzop team.

FAQ

The Panorama program claimed that tubes were dislodged in 40% of Letby's 50 shifts at the neonatal unit, suggesting she was either "spectacularly bad" or "acting maliciously."
Statisticians, including Dr. Jane Hutton from the University of Warwick, stated that the BBC had mixed up "working" shifts with "ventilated" shifts, leading to an inflated dislodged tube rate. They called for a correction and apology from the BBC over the "seriously erroneous information."
The inquiry heard that Letby was supervised throughout her shifts at the Liverpool hospital and had passed both her placements, with her clinical competence being monitored by assigned mentors. She was also awarded her formal qualification as a neonatal nurse at the end of her 2015 placement.

Read more news on