What is the Supreme Court's stance on social media content regulation?

The Supreme Court emphasized the importance of an autonomous regulator for user-generated content on social media to ensure accountability.

Who are Samay Raina and Ranveer Allahbadia in the SC case?

Samay Raina and Ranveer Allahbadia are comedians named in FIRs, whose cases brought up discussions on social media content regulation.

Why does the Supreme Court want a regulator for online content?

The court believes an autonomous regulator is necessary because users currently upload content without accountability, and problematic content goes viral quickly.

Home / Crime and Justice / SC Demands Social Media Content Regulator

SC Demands Social Media Content Regulator

27 Nov

•

Summary

Supreme Court emphasizes need for an autonomous content regulator.
Court notes users upload content without accountability.
Comedians Samay Raina and Ranveer Allahbadia faced FIRs.

SC Demands Social Media Content Regulator

The Supreme Court has underscored the critical need for an independent and autonomous regulatory body to oversee user-generated content on social media platforms. The bench emphasized that a system is required where content creators are held accountable for what they upload.

During the proceedings, concerns were raised about the rapid virality of potentially harmful or perverse content before authorities can intervene. The court noted the lack of accountability for individuals who create and disseminate content online, irrespective of its nature.

The issue gained prominence following cases involving comedians Samay Raina and Ranveer Allahbadia, who were named in several First Information Reports. The court also directed comedians to raise funds for the treatment of specially-abled individuals, highlighting the impact of online content on vulnerable communities.

Disclaimer: This story has been auto-aggregated and auto-summarised by a computer program. This story has not been edited or created by the Feedzop team.