What defense is Randy Santos' lawyer using in the NYC slaying trial?

Randy Santos' lawyer is using an insanity defense, arguing that schizophrenia and auditory hallucinations prevented him from understanding the consequences of his actions.

What evidence do prosecutors cite in the NYC slaying case?

Prosecutors cite surveillance video showing the attacks, the bloodied murder weapon, and the defendant's own recognition of himself in the footage as evidence.

What are the potential outcomes for Randy Santos if convicted or found not guilty by reason of insanity?

If convicted, Randy Santos could face life in prison. If found not criminally responsible due to insanity, he could be sent to a psychiatric treatment facility.

Home / Crime and Justice / Voices Drove Slaying Suspect, Lawyer Claims

Voices Drove Slaying Suspect, Lawyer Claims

28 Jan

•

Summary

Defendant claims he heard voices telling him to kill.
Lawyer argues mental illness warrants psychiatric care.
Prosecution asserts defendant knew his actions were wrong.

Voices Drove Slaying Suspect, Lawyer Claims

Randy Santos, 31, is on trial for the 2019 Chinatown rampage that killed four men and injured two others. His defense attorney stated that Santos was diagnosed with schizophrenia months prior and heard voices commanding him to kill, asserting he is not criminally responsible due to his mental state.

Prosecutors presented evidence, including surveillance video and the murder weapon, arguing Santos knew his actions were illegal and morally wrong. They highlighted his awareness of his own actions and the surroundings before the attacks, suggesting a clear understanding of consequences. His prior diagnoses and release from jail without seeking treatment are also under scrutiny.

If convicted, Santos faces life in prison. Alternatively, a successful insanity defense could lead to commitment in a psychiatric treatment facility. New York's legal system has seen mixed results with similar insanity defenses in recent years.