Why are Musk's lawyers challenging the Twitter verdict?

Musk's lawyers are challenging the verdict, which found his tweets liable for Twitter investor losses, by focusing on a LinkedIn emoji reaction from the judge.

What role did a LinkedIn emoji play in the legal challenge?

An emoji reaction on LinkedIn, allegedly from Judge Kathaleen McCormick's account, is being used by Musk's lawyers as part of their strategy to overturn the verdict.

What was the judge's response to the emoji incident?

Judge Kathaleen McCormick stated she did not read the LinkedIn post and that her emoji use was either accidental or unintentional.

Home / Crime and Justice / Musk's Lawyers Fight Verdict Over Emoji Reaction

Musk's Lawyers Fight Verdict Over Emoji Reaction

26 Mar

•

Summary

Musk's lawyers contest a verdict impacting Twitter investors.
A judge's LinkedIn emoji reaction is central to the appeal.
The judge stated the emoji use was accidental or unintentional.

Musk's Lawyers Fight Verdict Over Emoji Reaction

Lawyers representing Elon Musk are attempting to overturn a recent verdict that determined his past social media posts, described as "stupid tweets," made him liable for losses experienced by Twitter investors. The defense's strategy now centers on a specific incident involving Judge Kathaleen McCormick.

This strategy involves an emoji reaction posted on LinkedIn from an account associated with the judge. However, Judge McCormick has herself responded to this development. She stated in a separate filing that she had not read the LinkedIn post in question.

Furthermore, the judge clarified her interaction with the post, asserting that she "either did not click the 'support' icon at all, or I did so accidentally." This assertion aims to dismiss the relevance of the emoji reaction to the ongoing legal dispute.

Disclaimer: This story has been auto-aggregated and auto-summarised by a computer program. This story has not been edited or created by the Feedzop team.