Home / Crime and Justice / Red Flag Law Questioned After Minneapolis Shooting
Red Flag Law Questioned After Minneapolis Shooting
5 Sep
Summary
- Three people died in a Minneapolis shooting, including the suspect.
- Questions arise regarding the use of a red flag law.
- Authorities and experts debate the Hennepin County Attorney's decision.
Three individuals lost their lives, including the alleged perpetrator, in a recent downtown Minneapolis shooting incident. Authorities have identified the suspect as Carlton Johnson II, who reportedly killed two neighbors before being fatally shot by police. The aftermath of this violence has spurred discussions surrounding the effectiveness and application of "red flag laws."
Legal experts, including defense attorney Joe Tamburino, highlight two critical aspects: the suspect's alleged violent history, marked by numerous protection orders, and the county's decision not to pursue an emergency protection order. Tamburino pointed to a specific June 25 incident where Johnson allegedly threatened a resident with a gun as a potential trigger for such a law.
James Densley of Metro State University echoed these concerns, suggesting that the available background information might have warranted an "extreme risk protection order." However, the Hennepin County Attorney's Office stated there was insufficient evidence to proceed with a red flag law. Both Densley and Tamburino believe this case exemplifies situations where red flag laws are intended to intervene, potentially saving lives.
