feedzop-word-mark-logo
searchLogin
Feedzop
homeFor YouUnited StatesUnited States
You
bookmarksYour BookmarkshashtagYour Topics
Trending
trending

UPS plane crash investigation

trending

Food stamp benefits unclear

trending

Mega Millions jackpot at $800M

trending

Election results: Tuscarawas County levies

trending

Stifel raises DoorDash price

trending

FAA to cut flights

trending

Severe WA thunderstorm warning

trending

November full supermoon in Canada

trending

Ayton compares Wembanyama to Monstars

Terms of UsePrivacy PolicyAboutJobsPartner With Us

© 2025 Advergame Technologies Pvt. Ltd. ("ATPL"). Gamezop ® & Quizzop ® are registered trademarks of ATPL.

Gamezop is a plug-and-play gaming platform that any app or website can integrate to bring casual gaming for its users. Gamezop also operates Quizzop, a quizzing platform, that digital products can add as a trivia section.

Over 5,000 products from more than 70 countries have integrated Gamezop and Quizzop. These include Amazon, Samsung Internet, Snap, Tata Play, AccuWeather, Paytm, Gulf News, and Branch.

Games and trivia increase user engagement significantly within all kinds of apps and websites, besides opening a new stream of advertising revenue. Gamezop and Quizzop take 30 minutes to integrate and can be used for free: both by the products integrating them and end users

Increase ad revenue and engagement on your app / website with games, quizzes, astrology, and cricket content. Visit: business.gamezop.com

Property Code: 5571

Home / Crime and Justice / Court Rejects Discharge Plea in 1992 JJ Hospital Shooting Case

Court Rejects Discharge Plea in 1992 JJ Hospital Shooting Case

4 Nov

•

Summary

  • 63-year-old man arrested in 1992 JJ Hospital shooting case
  • Accused claims false implication, no evidence linking him to crime
  • Court rejects both discharge and bail pleas, case moves to full trial
Court Rejects Discharge Plea in 1992 JJ Hospital Shooting Case

In a significant development, a special court in Mumbai has rejected the discharge and bail pleas of a 63-year-old man arrested in the 1992 JJ Hospital shooting case. The incident was a deadly shootout stemming from a violent gang rivalry between the factions of Arun Gawli and Dawood Ibrahim, leaving three people dead, including two police constables.

The accused, Tribhuvan Rampatisingh, was arrested earlier this year, more than three decades after the incident. He had approached the court seeking discharge and bail, arguing that he had been falsely implicated due to mistaken identity and that there was no material evidence linking him to the shootout.

However, the court dismissed both the applications, ruling that there was prima facie material connecting the accused to the crime. The judge observed that the question of mistaken identity could only be determined during the trial and that the evidence on record disclosed sufficient grounds to proceed.

The prosecution had firmly established the accused's identity through medical and documentary records, including the fact that he had sustained firearm injuries during the police counter-firing and was treated at a hospital in Surat, where doctors and eyewitnesses later identified him.

With both the discharge and bail pleas rejected, the decades-old case now moves toward a full trial phase, keeping the spotlight on this long-standing and complex criminal investigation.

Disclaimer: This story has been auto-aggregated and auto-summarised by a computer program. This story has not been edited or created by the Feedzop team.
The 1992 JJ Hospital shooting case was a deadly incident that occurred in Mumbai, India, where a shootout stemming from a violent gang rivalry between the factions of Arun Gawli and Dawood Ibrahim left three people dead, including two police constables.
Tribhuvan Rampatisingh, also known as Shrikant Rai alias Pradhan, is a 63-year-old man who was arrested earlier this year in connection with the 1992 JJ Hospital shooting case.
The court rejected Tribhuvan Rampatisingh's discharge and bail pleas because it found prima facie material connecting him to the crime. The court ruled that the question of mistaken identity could only be determined during the trial and that the evidence on record disclosed sufficient grounds to proceed with the case.

Read more news on

Crime and Justiceside-arrow

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

You may also like

Motorcyclist Killed in Hit-and-Run Accident in Northeast Delhi

2 Nov • 12 reads

article image

Hospital Marketing Exec Denied Bail in Patient Deaths

31 Oct • 25 reads

article image

Nephew Arrested for Allegedly Killing Uncle in Violent Hospital Altercation

31 Oct • 23 reads

Niece of Convicted Rapist Found Dead in Kolkata Home

21 Oct • 43 reads

article image

Beloved Bollywood Actor Asrani Passes Away After Prolonged Illness

21 Oct • 56 reads

article image