Home / Crime and Justice / Chief Constable Liable for Contempt of Court

Chief Constable Liable for Contempt of Court

Summary

  • Chief Constable found personally liable and in contempt of court.
  • Court of Appeal made ruling on November 11.
  • Commissioner considered but rejected suspending the Chief Constable.
Chief Constable Liable for Contempt of Court

A significant court ruling has found Northamptonshire's Chief Constable, Ivan Balhatchet, personally liable and in contempt of court. This decision stems from the failure of officers to produce footage related to an arrest. The matter reached the Court of Appeal on November 11, resulting in the serious finding against the Chief Constable.

Danielle Stone, the Police, Fire, and Crime Commissioner, addressed the extraordinary situation at a panel meeting. She revealed that she had contemplated suspending Mr. Balhatchet but concluded it was not the appropriate course of action given the circumstances. Stone highlighted concerns about the Chief Constable's late awareness of the issue.

In response to the Court of Appeal's judgment, measures are now being implemented to address the contempt finding. The situation underscores the importance of evidence preservation and procedural adherence within law enforcement, with consequences for failures impacting judicial processes. The commissioner emphasized that actions are underway to rectify the situation.

Disclaimer: This story has been auto-aggregated and auto-summarised by a computer program. This story has not been edited or created by the Feedzop team.
Chief Constable Balhatchet was found in contempt of court for the failure of officers to produce footage of an arrest when legally required.
Actions are being taken in response to the court's ruling, although the specific measures have not been fully detailed.
No, the Police, Fire, and Crime Commissioner considered suspending the Chief Constable but decided against it, deeming it inappropriate at that time.

Read more news on