Home / Crime and Justice / Ex-SAS Star in Court Over "Sensitive" Secrets

Ex-SAS Star in Court Over "Sensitive" Secrets

Summary

  • Ant Middleton accused of breaching military contract.
  • Podcast shared "extremely sensitive" special forces details.
  • Court issued an injunction against Middleton pending trial.
Ex-SAS Star in Court Over "Sensitive" Secrets

Ant Middleton, formerly of Channel 4's SAS: Who Dares Wins, is accused by the Ministry of Defence of breaching a lifetime confidentiality contract. The MoD contends that Middleton disclosed "extremely sensitive" information concerning weapons, international partners, and intelligence matters in a July podcast episode. This action allegedly violates an agreement signed in 2008, which prohibits the disclosure of special forces information without explicit written consent.

The High Court has issued a temporary injunction against Middleton, deeming that its refusal could cause significant harm to UK special forces. The MoD stated that Middleton served from 2008 to 2011 and that any disclosure would have been refused had it been requested. They are also taking this legal action to reassure international partners about the security of their personnel's information.

Middleton, who represented himself, denies breaching the contract, arguing the information shared was easily obtainable online and that the legal action is disproportionate. He also suggested some details pertained to his time in the Royal Marines, which he believes is not covered by the MoD contract. A full trial is scheduled for March 3 next year, with the MoD seeking a permanent injunction.

Disclaimer: This story has been auto-aggregated and auto-summarised by a computer program. This story has not been edited or created by the Feedzop team.
Ant Middleton is accused of breaching a lifetime confidentiality contract by sharing sensitive details about his time in the special forces on a podcast.
Yes, the High Court granted a temporary injunction against Ant Middleton pending a full trial to prevent further disclosure of sensitive information.
The Ministry of Defence claims the podcast contained extremely sensitive references to weapons, international partners, and intelligence matters.

Read more news on