How should AI be used in the Indian judicial system?

AI should be used to assist in handling large volumes of data, identifying patterns, and reducing procedural delays, but not to deliver judgments.

Who emphasized that AI must not encroach upon core judicial functions?

Chief Justice of India Surya Kant emphasized that AI must not encroach upon the core judicial function of delivering judgments.

What is the role of human intellect when using AI in courts?

Human intellect must always determine the direction when AI is used as a tool or pathway in the judicial process.

Home / Crime and Justice / CJI: AI Must Aid, Not Adjudicate Justice

CJI: AI Must Aid, Not Adjudicate Justice

22 Mar

•

Summary

AI can handle data and reduce delays in courts.
Judgments must remain human decisions, not AI-driven.
AI's role is to assist, guided by human intellect.

CJI: AI Must Aid, Not Adjudicate Justice

Chief Justice of India Surya Kant recently advocated for the integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) into the judicial system, emphasizing its role as an assistive technology. Speaking at a seminar in Karnataka, he stated that AI should be utilized to manage large datasets, detect patterns, and expedite procedural processes, thereby enhancing efficiency.

However, the CJI cautioned against AI encroaching upon the fundamental judicial responsibility of delivering judgments. He stressed that allowing AI to dominate decision-making could jeopardize transparency and accountability within the justice delivery framework, asserting that the final pronouncement of verdicts must remain the prerogative of human judges, relying on their reasoning and experience.