Home / Business and Economy / Sebi Chief: Indian Board Independence Is Just Procedural
Sebi Chief: Indian Board Independence Is Just Procedural
7 Apr
Summary
- Independent directors' board independence is often procedural, not effective.
- Sebi advocates for quality board engagement over more regulations.
- Capacity building is identified as the next frontier for governance reforms.
Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi) Chairperson Tuhin Kanta Pandey has urged a significant change in the functioning of independent directors, asserting that their independence in Indian boardrooms is frequently procedural and fails to ensure effective oversight. Speaking at a corporate governance event on Monday, Pandey stressed the need for companies to transition from compliance-driven structures to environments that encourage diverse viewpoints and constructive disagreement.
Pandey indicated that the subsequent phase of governance reforms should prioritize enhancing the quality of board engagement over the implementation of new regulatory requirements. He noted that while boards are generally well-constituted, their effectiveness is not always consistent, with available information not always subjected to deep scrutiny.
The Sebi chairperson highlighted that independent directors are central to this effectiveness gap. Despite strengthened regulations regarding board composition and committee structures, true independence should be viewed as a foundational element, not the ultimate goal. He clarified that independent directors are expected to support solutions and ensure accountability, not solely to enforce compliance or criticize management.
Pandey observed a broad spectrum in the practices of independent directors, ranging from those who actively challenge management and contribute meaningfully to decision-making, to others whose roles are limited by restricted information access and a reliance on management's narratives. He acknowledged the inherent challenge of expecting oversight without direct operational involvement and accountability without full visibility.
Capacity building among independent directors is now considered the next critical area for governance reform, given the increasing complexity of issues addressed in boardrooms. These comments emerged amid increased scrutiny of corporate governance practices at HDFC Bank, following the departure of its former chairperson due to perceived incongruity in values and ethics.
