Supreme Court: Spectrum Belongs to Nation, Not Telcos

The Supreme Court has definitively ruled that spectrum is a national asset, not the property of individual telecom operators. This significant decision impacts how spectrum can be treated under frameworks like the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC).

Consequently, spectrum cannot be utilized as collateral for loans unless the government explicitly permits it, owing to the Department of Telecommunications' constitutional authority over these frequencies. This ruling ensures that spectrum rights remain with the government, safeguarding public interest.

Despite the reclassification, industry experts suggest that telecom companies' prospects for obtaining bank funding remain largely unaffected. Loans are typically secured by tangible assets such as equipment and real estate, with spectrum considered more of a secondary or 'comfort' collateral. Telcos like Vodafone Idea have historically not included spectrum in their loan collateral plans.

However, the ruling might influence the overall loan amounts offered by banks. Since spectrum's asset value cannot be factored in, financial institutions may adjust their lending capacities. Furthermore, any M&A deal involving spectrum will necessitate explicit approval from the Department of Telecommunications.

While the court's intent is to protect public interest by keeping spectrum within the telecom sector, some domain experts find the ruling unfair. They argue that telcos invest heavily in acquiring spectrum through auctions and that it should be recognized as an asset in financial transactions, especially given the deferred payment structures often involved. There's a call for mechanisms to measure spectrum utilization and welfare beyond mere revenue generation.