Home / Business and Economy / Pedestrian Scrambles: Cities Embrace Safer, Freer Crossings
Pedestrian Scrambles: Cities Embrace Safer, Freer Crossings
13 Sep
Summary
- Pedestrian scrambles allow diagonal street crossings for greater freedom and safety.
- Cities like Oakland and San Mateo are adopting scrambles to prioritize walkers.
- Concerns about congestion and driver delay are the main drawbacks to scrambles.

Pedestrian scrambles, marked by an 'X' on pavement, are transforming urban intersections by allowing diagonal street crossings. This innovative design, originating in cities like Kansas City and Vancouver, prioritizes pedestrian movement and safety. San Francisco has embraced the 'Barnes Dance,' as it's known, with 31 such crossings enhancing freedom for walkers in dense areas. Other cities, including Oakland and San Mateo, are also adopting this model, using it to signal a shift towards prioritizing people over cars and even to create shareable social media moments.
While visually striking and popular with pedestrians, the scramble design is not without its critics. Traffic engineers caution that careful planning is essential, as scrambles can cause bottlenecks and increase traffic delays for drivers. These intersections work best in areas with high pedestrian volume, where the benefits of alternating signals outweigh potential congestion. Despite these concerns, the pedestrian scramble continues to gain traction nationally, appealing to cities seeking to enhance urban charm and convey progressive values.