Home / Business and Economy / Paramount's $1.88B Bond Demand in Warner Bros. Deal

Paramount's $1.88B Bond Demand in Warner Bros. Deal

Summary

  • Paramount demands $1.88 billion bond from states and WGA.
  • Bond seeks to cover losses if Warner Bros. deal fails.
  • Court to review Paramount's bond request on September 24.

Paramount reiterated its demand for a $1.88 billion bond from 12 states and the WGA in a court filing. This security is sought to cover losses Paramount anticipates if its takeover of Warner Bros. Discovery is delayed until after a trial concludes next spring. The legal challenge by these entities aims to block the acquisition.

U.S. District Judge Araceli Martinez-Olguin has scheduled a hearing for September 24 to review Paramount's bond request. Previously, on August 17, Paramount submitted its initial demand. The states, spearheaded by California Attorney General Rob Bonta, argued in an August 31 filing that Paramount's potential financial damages are a result of its own agreements.

In their opposition, the states contended that Paramount is attempting to shift responsibility for its commitment to pay Warner Bros. Discovery shareholders a $7 million daily 'ticking fee' if the deal extends beyond October 1. They further argued that Paramount cannot demonstrate the court acted improvidently in approving the joint stipulation, nor should the public or a labor union underwrite Paramount's acquisition.

Paramount maintains that the plaintiffs must accept financial consequences if their legal challenge fails. A spokesperson stated that Paramount agreed to pause the merger to facilitate a prompt trial, expressly preserving its legal rights. Paramount is not seeking to lift the order preventing the merger, but rather to enforce the bond that protects its financial interests during the ongoing litigation. The company cited the Clayton Act and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65(c) as requiring plaintiffs to accept responsibility for substantial financial harm incurred if their challenge is unsuccessful. Paramount confirmed it agreed to delay closing to enable a prompt trial, but did not waive its right to bond protection while the transaction is paused.

Disclaimer: This story has been auto-aggregated and auto-summarised by a computer program. This story has not been edited or created by the Feedzop team.

Read more news on

Property Code: 5571