What are the main concerns of Hong Kong regulators regarding IPOs?

Regulators are concerned about serious deficiencies in listing documents, misaligned bank incentives, and a potential decline in quality due to the focus on numerous smaller deals.

How are banks incentivized in Hong Kong's IPO market?

Banks may be incentivized by underwriting fees averaging 2.2% to pursue many smaller deals rather than fewer, larger ones, potentially impacting due diligence.

What role do retail investors play in the Hong Kong IPO market?

Retail investors are highly enthusiastic, often using margin loans and new digital platforms like FINI to participate in oversubscribed IPOs, treating them like a lottery.

Home / Business and Economy / Hong Kong IPOs: Bankers' Rush Sparks Regulator Alarm

Hong Kong IPOs: Bankers' Rush Sparks Regulator Alarm

5 Feb

•

Summary

Regulators find serious deficiencies in new listing documents.
Banks may prioritize smaller deals for higher fees over quality.
Retail investors increasingly use margin loans for IPO subscriptions.

Hong Kong IPOs: Bankers' Rush Sparks Regulator Alarm

Hong Kong's financial regulators have expressed serious concerns about the city's booming initial public offering (IPO) market, citing "serious deficiencies" in the preparation of new listing documents by investment banks. These concerns stem from fears that the incentives for banks are misaligned, potentially leading to a decline in quality as they prioritize numerous smaller deals over fewer, larger ones.

In January of 2026, nearly 100 companies filed for public listings, a significant increase from the previous year, with over 400 more awaiting approval. This rapid pace has prompted the Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) to request that 13 banks review their procedures.

Underwriting fees, which averaged 2.2% in the prior year, can incentivize bankers to pursue smaller deals that offer higher percentage-based returns. This trend is exacerbated by a post-IPO drought environment where bankers are eager for bonuses. Evidence suggests a slip in quality, with a notable number of IPOs underperforming on their trading debut.