Home / Arts and Entertainment / The Untold Story of Back to the Future's Original Marty McFly
The Untold Story of Back to the Future's Original Marty McFly
10 Sep
Summary
- Eric Stoltz was originally cast as Marty McFly before being replaced by Michael J. Fox
- Stoltz's performance was deemed too dramatic, lacking the humor and energy of the character
- The decision to recast the lead role reshaped the entire Back to the Future franchise

In a surprising revelation, a recent article delves into the behind-the-scenes story of the Back to the Future trilogy, uncovering the existence of an alternate version of the classic film that was shot with a different lead actor. According to the article, Eric Stoltz was originally cast as Marty McFly, the charismatic protagonist, before being replaced by Michael J. Fox.
The article explains that while Stoltz was a respected actor, his interpretation of Marty was far more dramatic and introspective than the lighthearted, comedic character envisioned by the filmmakers. This mismatch in tone was immediately apparent to everyone involved, including producer Steven Spielberg, who acknowledged the lack of humor during the early shoots. Ultimately, the decision was made to recast the role, a move that came at a significant cost, with five weeks of filming already completed and millions of dollars spent.
The article suggests that the recasting of Marty McFly had a ripple effect, leading to changes in the supporting cast as well. Melora Hardin, who was originally cast as Jennifer, the love interest, was let go because she did not visually match the new Marty, played by the shorter Michael J. Fox. This domino effect reshaped the entire ecosystem of the film, potentially altering the dynamics and chemistry between the characters.
The article also explores the possibility of what could have been, had Stoltz remained in the role. While the filmmakers and the article's author agree that the final version with Fox was the right choice, the author expresses a strong desire to see the Stoltz footage, even if only in a documentary or compilation, to understand how the movie could have turned out differently. The article suggests that this "ghost movie" could provide valuable insights into the creative process and the high-stakes decisions that Hollywood often faces.