Is Wicked: For Good visually impressive?

Yes, the film is a showpiece for production values and visuals, offering a beautiful Wizard of Oz experience.

How do the songs in Wicked: For Good compare to the first movie?

The new songs are generally considered less catchy and memorable than those in the first installment.

Does Ariana Grande perform well in Wicked: For Good?

Yes, Ariana Grande is highlighted as a standout performer, stealing scenes with her powerful voice and acting.

Home / Arts and Entertainment / Wicked Sequel: Stunning Visuals, Sluggish Script

Wicked Sequel: Stunning Visuals, Sluggish Script

20 Nov

•

Summary

Film boasts impressive production values and visuals.
New songs lack catchiness compared to the first installment.
Ariana Grande delivers a standout performance.

Wicked Sequel: Stunning Visuals, Sluggish Script

Wicked: For Good delivers exceptional production values and stunning visuals, creating an immersive Wizard of Oz world. Despite the visual splendor, the film struggles with pacing, particularly in its first two acts, which feel drawn out. The new songs, a crucial element for a musical, do not match the memorable quality of the first film, often feeling like filler.

Dialogue also presents challenges, frequently appearing verbose when simpler phrasing would suffice, impacting the overall flow. While actors like Cynthia Erivo and Ariana Grande deliver strong performances, with Grande particularly commanding the screen, the script's weaknesses are evident. The third act, though a solid conclusion, feels somewhat rushed.

Director Jon M. Chu has crafted a visually grand spectacle, showcasing outstanding world-building. Though the musical numbers may disappoint some, the cast's dedication is commendable. Ultimately, Wicked: For Good is an entertaining and visually remarkable film, but it falls short of the first installment's overall impact.