Why does Ram Gopal Varma say 'Animal' couldn't be made by a corporation?

Varma believes films with a singular, bold vision, like 'Animal,' require one person's uncompromised direction, which is hindered by corporate committee decision-making.

What are the downsides of corporate filmmaking according to RGV?

RGV feels that multiple decision-makers in corporate structures dilute creative freedom and artistic integrity, as each person has different tastes and ideas.

Does Ram Gopal Varma prefer individual filmmaking over corporate models?

Varma acknowledges advantages and drawbacks in both systems, but stresses that some films inherently need an individual's uncompromised vision.

Home / Arts and Entertainment / RGV: Corporate Film Sets Kill Creative Risks

RGV: Corporate Film Sets Kill Creative Risks

12 Dec, 2025

•

Summary

Corporate film structures hinder singular creative visions.
Multiple decision-makers dilute artistic integrity in films.
RGV believes films like 'Animal' require one person's vision.

RGV: Corporate Film Sets Kill Creative Risks

Filmmaker Ram Gopal Varma recently shared his perspective on the evolution of filmmaking, particularly contrasting individualistic creative processes with modern corporate-backed productions. He observed that while corporate structures bring transparency, they often introduce limitations due to the multiplicity of decision-makers, each with differing tastes and sensibilities.

Varma specifically pointed to films like 'Animal,' suggesting that such projects, driven by a singular, strong vision, could never originate from a committee-driven corporate environment. He emphasized that a film's success or failure ultimately dictates the perception of creative freedom, acknowledging that both systems have their merits and drawbacks.