Public Figures: Not Public Property, Say Experts

Public figures are drawing a firm line between public scrutiny and personal attacks, with actress Khushbu Sundar stating clearly, "I am a public figure, not public property." She emphasized that while she welcomes discussion about her professional conduct, any abuse directed at her family would warrant a similar response.

Psychotherapist Delnna Rrajesh elaborated on this distinction, noting that visibility does not equate to ownership. "Freedom of expression does not automatically justify personal abuse," she stated, highlighting that family members of celebrities often have not chosen public exposure and deserve dignity.

Psychology offers insights into this phenomenon, with the concept of parasocial relationships explaining how audiences can develop an one-sided familiarity with public personalities. This familiarity, however, can sometimes morph into a sense of entitlement, leading individuals to believe they have unrestricted access to a celebrity's life.

Furthermore, the online disinhibition effect contributes to aggressive behavior. Anonymity and reduced accountability online can encourage individuals to express cruelty more readily, especially when amplified by public approval or viral attention. Experts stress the importance of differentiating between valid criticism of opinions and the deliberate humiliation of a person or their family.

Anger can signal violated boundaries, but Rrajesh advises against retaliatory aggression. Assertiveness, she suggests, is a more constructive approach. "We can confront harassment, demand accountability and establish boundaries without becoming cruel ourselves," she remarked. This principle extends to educating children about empathy and respect, even for those not universally admired, reinforcing that kindness and accountability are compatible.