Home / Arts and Entertainment / Drag Star Pattie Gonia Sues Patagonia Over Brand Name
Drag Star Pattie Gonia Sues Patagonia Over Brand Name
28 May
Summary
- Climate activist Pattie Gonia is in a legal battle with Patagonia.
- Patagonia claims Pattie's brand infringes on their trademark.
- Pattie Gonia accuses Patagonia of attacking queer climate activism.

Climate activist and drag performer Pattie Gonia is engaged in a public legal dispute with outdoor apparel company Patagonia. Patagonia initiated a lawsuit in January, asserting that Pattie Gonia's expanding business activities and trademark applications create consumer confusion and infringe upon their existing trademark. This legal action has escalated as Pattie Gonia has publicly appealed for the lawsuit to be withdrawn.
Pattie Gonia, whose real name is Wyn Wiley, has amassed a significant online following by merging environmental advocacy with LGBTQ+ inclusion and outdoor culture. In an open letter, Pattie expressed the emotional toll of the legal battle, stating that Patagonia's pursuit of the case could financially cripple her operations. The activist also urged public pressure on Patagonia to cease legal action, emphasizing that her merchandise does not use Patagonia's official branding.
Patagonia contends that they made numerous attempts to resolve the matter privately before resorting to legal proceedings. The company maintains that trademark protection is essential to safeguard its brand identity, built over decades by its employees, and to continue its work in environmental activism and community impact. Patagonia is reportedly seeking only $1 in nominal damages, with its primary goal being to prevent Pattie Gonia from securing a federal trademark and to halt merchandise sales perceived as infringing on their brand.
The public nature of this conflict, particularly its emergence shortly before Pride Month, has been described as a public relations challenge. While Patagonia has a history of aggressively defending its trademarks against other companies, the optics of this dispute between two entities often associated with progressive values are considered complex and surreal. The legal showdown is expected to continue.