Home / Arts and Entertainment / Designer Award: Creativity vs. Commerce Battle
Designer Award: Creativity vs. Commerce Battle
28 Feb
Summary
- Judges debated championing creativity versus commercial appeal.
- An emerging, commercially focused label ultimately won.
- One judge felt a creative spark was a missed opportunity.

The National Designer award, a prestigious accolade established in 1997, recently concluded its most contentious selection process to date. Seven judges engaged in a two-hour debate, divided over whether the award should champion pure creativity or commercial viability, and whether established labels should receive preference. Ultimately, the Brisbane-based label Joaen, led by Grace Kelly and her mother Mandy Kelly, secured the prize, recognized for its commercial focus.
Some judges, like Megha Kapoor, advocated for labels such as Haluminous, highlighting their unique creative vision. Kapoor expressed concern that the outcome leaned too heavily towards commercial readiness, potentially missing an opportunity to support an emerging designer with a distinct artistic perspective. This sentiment was echoed by others who championed brands like Haluminous for their innovative design aesthetic.
Melvin Tanaya, a judge and co-founder of Song for the Mute, emphasized the award's potential to bolster emerging businesses, drawing from his own experience winning the award early in his career. He expressed a desire to support designers with long-term potential, indicating that creativity, while valued, needs to be balanced with readiness to avoid detrimental impacts on a nascent business. Tanaya even offered personal mentorship to a finalist outside the award structure.
The award criteria include brand vision, business strategy, sustainability, quality manufacturing, and design aesthetic, with the latter holding 40% weight. Chris Wilson, an executive at sponsor David Jones, noted that 'hanger appeal' is considered alongside other factors. He attributed the rigorous debates to the high caliber of this year's finalists, with judges bringing diverse industry perspectives to the table.
Last year's winner, Amy Lawrence, was noted for her non-commercial, bespoke approach, demonstrating that past outcomes have not always prioritized commercial success. Caroline Ralphsmith, CEO of Melbourne Fashion Festival, suggested that while some finalists this year, like Beare Park, showed significant commercial traction, the ultimate decision considered future commercial potential. The Australian fashion industry's current challenges, including threats to local manufacturing, make this award a crucial stepping stone for emerging brands.




