Why is Maverick City Music suing Tony Brown?

Maverick City Music countersued Tony Brown for allegedly breaching his contract and violating his non-compete agreement by starting a new music project.

What damages is Maverick City Music seeking from Tony Brown?

Maverick City Music is seeking $10 million in damages from Tony Brown for breach of contract and other alleged violations.

What is Tony Brown's defense against Maverick City's lawsuit?

Tony Brown's defense is that Maverick City Music never paid him the agreed-upon buyout sum, making the non-compete clause unenforceable.

Home / Arts and Entertainment / Maverick City Accuses Brown of Contract Breach

Maverick City Accuses Brown of Contract Breach

13 Jan

•

Summary

Maverick City Music countersued its co-founder for $10 million.
The lawsuit alleges breach of contract and misuse of confidential information.
A hearing occurred on January 12, 2026, with no rulings yet issued.

Maverick City Accuses Brown of Contract Breach

Maverick City Music filed a countersuit in New York on December 8, 2025, against co-founder Tony Brown. The Grammy-winning worship collective accuses Brown of breaching his contract by launching a new Christian music project, God Aura, which allegedly violates his non-compete agreement.

The group claims Brown is actively recruiting their artists and producers, using his old email account to suggest project connections. Maverick City seeks $10 million for breach of contract, tortious interference, and misappropriation of trade secrets.

Brown's legal team argues the non-compete clause is unenforceable as Maverick City allegedly failed to pay the agreed buyout sum. A hearing took place on January 12, 2026, in Atlanta, but no rulings have been announced.

This story has been auto-aggregated and auto-summarised by a computer program. This story has not been edited or created by the Feedzop team.