Home / Arts and Entertainment / No Wet Room? How 'Location, Location, Location' Rejects Homes

No Wet Room? How 'Location, Location, Location' Rejects Homes

Summary

  • Homes were rejected for not having a wet room, a strange requirement.
  • Presenters have little say in property selection for the show.
  • Show episodes air months after filming, offering no immediate sales benefit.
No Wet Room? How 'Location, Location, Location' Rejects Homes

A recent revelation from a former homeowner has shed light on the behind-the-scenes selection process for the popular Channel 4 show "Location, Location, Location." The seller shared on Reddit that their house was rejected for the program approximately 15 years ago due to not possessing a wet room, a peculiar reason given the listing details.

This account further suggests that the show's presenters, Kirstie Allsop and Phil Spencer, have a limited role in choosing properties. Their involvement is primarily for filming segments, with the production team handling the initial scouting. This means buyers and sellers rarely interact with the hosts during the property selection phase.

Adding to the surprising revelations, the seller pointed out that the show's delayed airing schedule renders it largely unbeneficial for sellers. Episodes are typically broadcast months after filming, by which time the property in question has likely already been sold, diminishing any potential marketing advantage.

Disclaimer: This story has been auto-aggregated and auto-summarised by a computer program. This story has not been edited or created by the Feedzop team.

Read more news on

Property Code: 5571