Home / Arts and Entertainment / Lively & Baldoni Legal War Ends: Who Really Won?
Lively & Baldoni Legal War Ends: Who Really Won?
24 Jun
Summary
- Legal battle between Blake Lively and Justin Baldoni concluded with an out-of-court settlement.
- Baldoni ordered to pay Lively's legal fees but denied damages by the court.
- Both stars face reputation rehabilitation after the polarizing 18-month feud.

After an 18-month legal conflict involving more than 1,400 court filings, Blake Lively and Justin Baldoni have settled their dispute out of court. On June 12, 2026, Judge Lewis Liman ordered Baldoni to cover Lively's legal fees under a California law designed to protect sexual harassment victims from retaliatory defamation claims. However, Lively's pursuit of damages was unsuccessful.
The exact amount Baldoni is required to pay Lively, both 38 and 42 respectively, has not yet been determined by the court. Sources indicate both stars are focused on moving past the public feud. Baldoni is prioritizing his family, while Lively intends to return to her acting career.
PR experts suggest both parties face a difficult road to repairing their reputations. While neither emerged as a clear winner, Lively's approachable image was perceived to be more tarnished by the lawsuit. Baldoni's public persona as a sensitive podcast host also took a significant hit.
Lively had expressed a readiness for trial, alleging Baldoni improvised intimate scenes and made inappropriate comments during filming. She reportedly desired the opportunity to share her story in court. Despite the stress, Lively is relieved to move forward and focus on her family and career.
Baldoni found relief when most of Lively's allegations were dismissed in April 2026. The settlement, reached voluntarily by Lively dropping remaining claims, ended the protracted legal process. A public trial could have been detrimental to both actors' public perceptions.
Lively's legal team emphasized the ruling on legal fees as a significant triumph, highlighting the law's role in protecting victims. They noted Baldoni and his collaborators are the first plaintiffs found liable under California Civil Code Section 47.1 for retaliating against a victim.
Some perceive Lively may not feel fully vindicated, while others state the agreement was conditional on Baldoni's parties acknowledging her claims deserved to be heard. However, others maintain the settlement was a mutual decision with no admission of wrongdoing.
Attorneys acknowledge the complexity of the outcome, with Baldoni losing his countersuit and facing fee awards, while most of Lively's claims were dismissed without damages. Legal fees, estimated to be around $180,000, are being finalized.
Baldoni is reportedly considering writing a book about his experiences and has relocated to Nashville with his wife for privacy. He is not actively seeking directing or acting roles but anticipates returning to work. Lively is intentionally selecting future projects, prioritizing those that make her feel safe and supported.
Attorneys predict final fee motions will conclude the matter, ending the 18-month legal entanglement. This case involved significant legal proceedings, including Baldoni's prior defamation suit against The New York Times, which incurred $180,000 in legal fees.