Home / Arts and Entertainment / IMPPA Clarifies Bombay High Court Order Misinterpretations
IMPPA Clarifies Bombay High Court Order Misinterpretations
13 Sep
Summary
- IMPPA issued a clarification on Bombay High Court order interpretations.
- The clarification addresses a dispute between Saffron Magicworks and Andolan Films.
- IMPPA stated no blanket restraining order was issued against its functions.

The Indian Motion Picture Producers' Association (IMPPA) has issued a critical clarification concerning a recent order from the Bombay High Court. This statement aims to correct what IMPPA describes as incorrect interpretations circulating about the ruling. The dispute originally involved Saffron Magicworks Private Limited, owned by Nikhil Dwivedi, and Andolan Films Private Limited, owned by Vikramaditya Motwane.
IMPPA stressed that its role in the proceedings is confined to its institutional duties as outlined in its governing documents. The association clarified that any determination made by its Dispute Resolution Committee pertains solely to the parties and issues brought before it. IMPPA explicitly stated it holds no independent commercial interest in the underlying conflict.
Further addressing widespread reports, IMPPA confirmed that no sweeping order has been passed to halt its institutional operations. The association insists that the current circulating reports do not accurately represent the court order's scope or its implications for IMPPA. It maintains it will continue its responsibilities as per law and court directives.