Home / Arts and Entertainment / Singer Slams AI Voice Cloning as 'Sick'
Singer Slams AI Voice Cloning as 'Sick'
3 Aug
Summary
- AI should be a creative aid, not the composition's driving force.
- Recreating an artist's voice or style with AI is deemed 'sick'.
- Technology can enhance vision but should not control the artist.

Veteran singer Hariharan has voiced strong concerns regarding the increasing use of artificial intelligence in music creation. He firmly believes that AI should function solely as a supporting tool for musicians, enhancing their creative process rather than dictating it.
Hariharan explicitly condemned the practice of AI recreating an artist's unique voice or musical style, describing it as "sick." He argued that while AI can be used as a prop or instrument to make music more interesting, it should never replace the fundamental act of composition. The singer's comments highlight a growing debate about originality and artistic integrity in the digital age.
During a discussion, music composer Leslee Lewis presented a more measured view. Lewis recalled how new technologies, such as computers in the 1990s, were initially met with skepticism but eventually integrated into creative workflows. He posited that AI's value lies in its responsible application, where artists retain control and use it to execute their specific artistic visions efficiently.
Both artists agreed that AI should not be used to imitate existing work or generate random content. Instead, its purpose should be to assist creators in bringing their unique visions to life in a realistic and effective manner, ensuring technology serves art, not the other way around.