Home / Arts and Entertainment / Drishyam 3: Flawed Thrills, Family's Fate
Drishyam 3: Flawed Thrills, Family's Fate
7 Oct
Summary
- Vijay Salgaonkar's family protection relies on unbelievable tropes.
- Key forensic evidence is barely investigated, raising plot questions.
- The film relies on chance and convenience over solid facts.

The final installment of the Drishyam franchise, Drishyam 3: The Conclusion, showcases Vijay Salgaonkar's remarkable ability to stay ahead of legal challenges to protect his family. However, the film is noted for its reliance on improbable plot devices to maintain suspense.
The narrative faces scrutiny for apparent investigative oversights. A critical piece of forensic evidence, suggesting the presence of Sameer Deshmukh's DNA at the under-construction police station, is introduced but not thoroughly pursued, leaving key questions unanswered.
Further plot inconsistencies arise concerning DNA evidence related to a skeleton found at the police station. Investigators identify the skeleton as belonging to Christopher Pinto, but subsequent discoveries, including another skeleton in Pinto's grave, are not rigorously investigated, creating narrative leaps.
The film's progression, particularly in its latter half, is criticized for depending heavily on fortunate events rather than factual investigation. Convenient timing, such as Rajveer Singh Tomar missing crucial court proceedings, undermines the established character of the formidable investigator.
Despite these criticisms, Drishyam 3 is acknowledged for its suspenseful courtroom sequences and satisfying, albeit convenient, conclusion. The film has achieved significant box office success, surpassing Rs 300 crore worldwide within four days of its release.
The franchise concludes, leaving behind memorable characters and a legacy in Hindi cinema. The film, directed by Abhishek Pathak, continues to be screened in theaters.